A way to check for check..

[Martin Hepworth]

    [ The following text is in the "ISO-8859-1" character set. ]
    [ Your display is set for the "US-ASCII" character set.  ]
    [ Some characters may be displayed incorrectly. ]

Marcel Blenkers wrote:
> Hi Martin,
> 
> 
>>
>>I fine the traditional RBL's less and less useful. The URI-RBLS in SA are much
>>better at triggering spam.
>>
>>Also check the extra rules in www.rulesemporium.com as they are very useful in
>>trapping this rubbish.
> 
> 
> i am using rule_du_jour :)
> guess those mails are not in any rbl..
> 
> it seems that those spammers really worked out to create mails with 
> maximum 4,9points..as the usual sa-spam-points are set to 5..
> 
> so i guess i set the min.spam-point down to 4..
> 
> 
> thanks for the mail =)
> 
> Greetings
> 
> Marcel

Depends on the rules you have in rules-du-jour there's alot more in 
rulesemporium than comes with the default RDJ set...

-- 
--
Martin Hepworth
Senior Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic Ltd
tel: +44 (0)1865 842300

**********************************************************************

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept
for the presence of computer viruses and is believed to be clean.	

**********************************************************************

------------------------ MailScanner list ------------------------
To unsubscribe, email jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk with the words:
'leave mailscanner' in the body of the email.
Before posting, read the Wiki (http://wiki.mailscanner.info/) and
the archives (http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html).

Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!