SA RBLs not working?
adrik at SALESMANAGER.NL
Wed Aug 24 14:26:00 IST 2005
> -----Original Message-----
> From: MailScanner mailing list
> [mailto:MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Jan-Peter Koopmann
> Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 14:55
> To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> Subject: SA RBLs not working?
> Importance: High
> I just noticed something strange: We received a mail via the
> following two gateways:
> 220.127.116.11 mx25.web.de
> 18.104.22.168 adsl-69-233-133-209.dsl.scrm01.pacbell.net
> 22.214.171.124 is listed in several lists like Spamcop,
> SBL+XBL, DSBL etc. But SpamAssassin only reports
> RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET. No RCVD_IN_DSBL etc. This happens
> with SA 3.0.4. Net-DNS Module is current. RCVD_IN_DSBL has a
> score and skip_rbl_checks is set to 0. Any ideas?
Are you missing these in the $longspamreport as generated by the
inline.spam.warning.txt report or also from the X-MailScanner-SpamCheck
I have noticed for about 6 months, the $longspamreport is sometimes
missing pieces of text, resulting in bit of text deleted and then
another line concataneted at the end of the chopped line.
Here's an example of what I often see:
0.0 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60
1.5 RAZOR2_CHECK Listed in Razor2 (http://razor.sf.net/)
Notice the BAYES_50 line has [cf: 100] appended, which comes from a
chopped RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 line!
In those cases, then X-MailScanner-SpamCheck header line does show all
the rules which matched.
------------------------ MailScanner list ------------------------
To unsubscribe, email jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk with the words:
'leave mailscanner' in the body of the email.
Before posting, read the Wiki (http://wiki.mailscanner.info/) and
the archives (http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html).
Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
More information about the MailScanner