Another Postfix Question

[Drew Marshall]

On 1 Aug 2005, at 14:38, Ed Bruce wrote:

> Mike Kercher wrote:
>
>
>> hash_queue_depth = 1
>> hash_queue_names = incoming, active, deferred, bounce, defer,  
>> flush, hold,
>> trace
>>
>> This is on postfix-2.1.5-4.2.RHEL4
>>
>>
> What should this be? My results are:
>
> hash_queue_depth = 1
> hash_queue_names = deferred, defer

These are fine and are the defaults for 2.1.x (As newer disks and  
machines are able to find queue files quicker/ easier. As for what  
they should be, well that's up to you, your system load and the  
amount of 'bursty' mail you are processing. You may find hashed  
queues useful if you are handling large volumes of mail (Such as  
mailing list traffic).

Drew

-- 
In line with our policy, this message has 
been scanned for viruses and dangerous 
content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
www.themarshalls.co.uk/policy

------------------------ MailScanner list ------------------------
To unsubscribe, email jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk with the words:
'leave mailscanner' in the body of the email.
Before posting, read the Wiki (http://wiki.mailscanner.info/) and
the archives (http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html).

Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!