Another Postfix Question
drew at THEMARSHALLS.CO.UK
Mon Aug 1 19:53:48 IST 2005
On 1 Aug 2005, at 14:38, Ed Bruce wrote:
> Mike Kercher wrote:
>> hash_queue_depth = 1
>> hash_queue_names = incoming, active, deferred, bounce, defer,
>> flush, hold,
>> This is on postfix-2.1.5-4.2.RHEL4
> What should this be? My results are:
> hash_queue_depth = 1
> hash_queue_names = deferred, defer
These are fine and are the defaults for 2.1.x (As newer disks and
machines are able to find queue files quicker/ easier. As for what
they should be, well that's up to you, your system load and the
amount of 'bursty' mail you are processing. You may find hashed
queues useful if you are handling large volumes of mail (Such as
mailing list traffic).
In line with our policy, this message has
been scanned for viruses and dangerous
content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
------------------------ MailScanner list ------------------------
To unsubscribe, email jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk with the words:
'leave mailscanner' in the body of the email.
Before posting, read the Wiki (http://wiki.mailscanner.info/) and
the archives (http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html).
Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
More information about the MailScanner