definition: messages per month?

[Martin Hepworth]

<x-flowed>
Eric

I always use the 'envelopes' per month version myself...ie how many
actual messages (qf,df pairs - or whatever your MTA uses to store
messages in the queue) are processed.

Otherwise the stats go up the wall - hey my MS processed 2 billion
messages last month, when actually it only  processed two MTA queue file
message pairs!!!

I'm not concerned that a message had multiple recipients, I'm concerned
about the actual number of messages, which has a direct correlation to
the performance and size of the hardware required.

--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300


Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 02:49:06PM -0700, Fractal IT Dept. wrote:
>
>>Michele Neylon : Blacknight Solutions wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I'd go by whatever the SQL logging says :)
>>>
>>>
>>
>>That's what I was going by, using Mailwatch. But that doesn't seem to
>>take into account the extra recipients when there are multiples.
>
>
> I've been meaning to ask about the semantics of this myself for
> sometime. Since I'm about to run some stats for August (yes, I'm a
> little behind ... I was out sick most of last week) now's as a good a
> time as any.
>
> In addition to whether to count mails received or mails delivered, I've
> wondered how others come up with percentages of viruses, spams and other
> nasties caught. Obviously, I know how many were caught. But, I have to
> rely soley on user reports of false-positives and false-negatives for
> percentages missed. I know most of our users don't give us reports, so
> how can I even estimate these percentages? How do the various stats
> scripts and packages come up with numbers like these?
>
> And then, if something gets blocked or deleted, do you count how many
> people would have gotten it? or does each blocked mail count only once
> since it wasn't split out for delivery?
>
> I get all confused trying to keep this straight for myself. It's even
> worse trying to explain it to management.
>
> -Eric Rz.
>
> ------------------------ MailScanner list ------------------------
> To unsubscribe, email jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk with the words:
> 'leave mailscanner' in the body of the email.
> Before posting, read the MAQ (http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/) and
> the archives (http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html).

**********************************************************************

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept
for the presence of computer viruses and is believed to be clean.

**********************************************************************

------------------------ MailScanner list ------------------------
To unsubscribe, email jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk with the words:
'leave mailscanner' in the body of the email.
Before posting, read the MAQ (http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/) and
the archives (http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html).
</x-flowed>