Mail server backlogging - seems like a Bayes problem
mkettler at EVI-INC.COM
Mon Oct 25 16:24:27 IST 2004
At 11:37 PM 10/22/2004, Julian Field wrote:
>Thanks for that. I originally kept the timeout short as genuine SA timeout
>problems did cause difficulty when I first implemented. But SA has improved
>enormously since I first supported it, and I suspect you are right that it
>is now time to increase the timeout quite a bit. The last increase I did
>was from 30 to 40 seconds so SA had a chance to timeout DNS lookups before
>it could be totally killed by MailScanner.
>Thanks for your opinion, as ever :-)
You're welcome Julian.
And thanks for making a great product, even if it does require the
occasional tweak as SA and virus scanners evolve :)
(Next product improvement request: psychic adaptive spamassassin interface
module, to keep abreast of unexpected changes in future versions of SA.)
------------------------ MailScanner list ------------------------
To unsubscribe, email jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk with the words:
'leave mailscanner' in the body of the email.
Before posting, read the MAQ (http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/) and
the archives (http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html).
More information about the MailScanner