Never getting URIBL_PH_SURBL hits

[Peter Bonivart]

    [ The following text is in the "ISO-8859-1" character set. ]
    [ Your display is set for the "US-ASCII" character set.  ]
    [ Some characters may be displayed incorrectly. ]

Julian Field wrote:
> Just to prove I am in fact mortal after all, here's a weird one for you.
>
> Running SA3.0.1 within MS on a couple of Solaris boxes.
>
> I get plenty of SURBL hits, as you would expect, like this:
> URIBL_OB_SURBL 3.21, URIBL_SBL 1.00, URIBL_SC_SURBL 4.26, URIBL_WS_SURBL
> 1.46
>
> So the SURBL stuff is basically working very happily.
>
> But I never get a hit on URIBL_PH_SURBL (the anti-phishing list).

These are my hits with SA2.64:

WS_URI_RBL|430924
OB_URI_RBL|372630
SC_URI_RBL|283991
AB_URI_RBL|252462
PH_URI_RBL|1073

The PH list doesn't hit much compared to the others, I upgraded to
SA3.0.1 a couple of days ago and there's no hits so far on the PH list.
Regardless of which list hits the most, together they help a lot.

--
/Peter Bonivart

--Unix lovers do it in the Sun

------------------------ MailScanner list ------------------------
To unsubscribe, email jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk with the words:
'leave mailscanner' in the body of the email.
Before posting, read the MAQ (http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/) and
the archives (http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html).

Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!