MS performance as a gateway comments

[Drew Marshall]

    [ The following text is in the "iso-8859-1" character set. ]
    [ Your display is set for the "US-ASCII" character set.  ]
    [ Some characters may be displayed incorrectly. ]

On Tue, November 9, 2004 7:24, Jan-Peter Koopmann said:
> Alan,
>
>> I'm not on any kind of soapbox here, all I'm doing is posting
>> my obeservations related to my experience with three
>> different MTAs and their resource usage in a gateway
>> envirronment. Perhaps it might help someone else.
>
> Thanks for sharing your observation. I learned of a new high performance
> mailer and should I ever have to administer a box with so many mails
> (and performance problems) I now have an alternative to PostFix...
>
I would have loved you to have had a chance to try Postfix as well so
there was a complete MS supported MTA comparison (I'm not suggesting you
should break what you have just to complete the report ;-) ). I too have
never used zMailer preferring Postfix (As I'm stupid and find it much
easier to setup :-) ) but I'm always interested and on the lookout for
different ideas and options.

Drew


--
In line with our policy, this message has
been scanned for viruses and dangerous
content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
www.themarshalls.co.uk/policy

------------------------ MailScanner list ------------------------
To unsubscribe, email jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk with the words:
'leave mailscanner' in the body of the email.
Before posting, read the MAQ (http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/) and
the archives (http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html).