dspam!

[Michele Neylon :: Blacknight Solutions]

> Looking at the overwhelming support for SA I hereby withdraw
> my request to support multiple spam engines (specially ones
> containing the word dspam). Ok, I understand as Jan says that
> adding dspam or the likes would make no great difference to
> spam detection (unless the engine is truly revolutionary) and
> at the same time would increase Julian's effort in
> maintaining the code (and my hardware requirement). Plus the
> fact that the secondary engine would serve no purpose since
> all obvious spam would be dropped at the primary engine
> (leaving the secondary only with mostly ham).
>
> But this is where I see open-source making a difference,
> anyone convinced of dspam's capability is free to start a
> patch supporting dspam (or libdspam).
>
You've hit the nail on the head.
If you want to patch/fork to support it you are free to do so :)


Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd
Hosting, co-location & domains
http://www.blacknight.ie/
Tel. +353 59 9137101
Proud sponsors of MM04 {http://www.mm04.net}

------------------------ MailScanner list ------------------------
To unsubscribe, email jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk with the words:
'leave mailscanner' in the body of the email.
Before posting, read the MAQ (http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/) and
the archives (http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html).