dspam!

[David Jacobson]

<QUOTE>> Did you actually read what Julian said?
My thoughts exactly. Probably not.</QUOTE>

Perhaps you should take your own advise and see that I never wrote the
second post.  Maybe _READING_ would help before replying with no useful
information and addressing it to the wrong person.

On Mon, 2004-11-01 at 13:50, Jan-Peter Koopmann wrote:
> On : Blacknight Solutions MailScanner mailing list wrote:
> 
> >> Having read this
> >> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A2=ind0402&L=mailsc
> >> anner&D=0&I=-1&P=173426 and quoting 'Wietse Venema' "don't depend on
> >> one solution for spam", I wouldn't mind MailScanner supporting both
> >> SA as well as dspam. 
> >> 
> > 
> > Did you actually read what Julian said?
> 
> My thoughts exactly. Probably not.
> 
> David, please read the posting again. It states that Dspam is the one
> relying on one (or few) solutions for fighting spam whereas SpamAssassin
> is using several different approaches. SpamAssassin is the way to go...
> 
> Regards,
>   JP
> 
> ------------------------ MailScanner list ------------------------
> To unsubscribe, email jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk with the words:
> 'leave mailscanner' in the body of the email.
> Before posting, read the MAQ (http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/) and
> the archives (http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html).
-- 
Regards,

David Jacobson
Technical Director
SYNAQ (Pty) Ltd

Tel:    011 290 6388
Cell:   083 235 0760
Mail:   davidj at synaq.com
WWW:    http://www.synaq.com	

Key Fingerprint
8246 FCE1 3C22 7EFB E61B  18DF 6E8B 65E8 BD50 78A1

------------------------ MailScanner list ------------------------
To unsubscribe, email jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk with the words:
'leave mailscanner' in the body of the email.
Before posting, read the MAQ (http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/) and
the archives (http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html).

    [ Part 2, "This is a digitally signed message part"  ]
    [ Application/PGP-SIGNATURE  196bytes. ]
    [ Unable to print this part. ]