bayes problem locking problem ?
Robert Mena
rt_mena at YAHOO.COM
Wed May 26 15:07:00 IST 2004
Hi MailScanners :) anyone with a solution for this ?
I've restarted spassassin but with no bayes and so far
it is running smooth (but letting all spam go
through)...
--- Eelco Wesemann <eelco at NETNATION.NL> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> No sollution, but a "same here". I've had similar
> behavour on my setup:
> sendmail+clamav+sa.
> When running MS and SA in debug mode, I noticed that
> around 50% to 80% of the
> processing time was spent on obtaining a lock on the
> bayes database.
>
> My setup:
> debian unstable, kernel 2.6.5
> sendmail-8.12.11
> MailScanner-4.30.3
> clamav-0.71
> spamassassin-2.63
>
> Max SpamAssassin Size = 30000
> Max Unscanned Bytes Per Scan = 100000000
> Max Unsafe Bytes Per Scan = 50000000
> Max Unscanned Messages Per Scan = 40
> Max Unsafe Messages Per Scan = 40
> Max Normal Queue Size = 2000
>
> Bayes magic:
> 0.000 0 2 0 non-token
> data: bayes db version
> 0.000 0 163094 0 non-token
> data: nspam
> 0.000 0 13224 0 non-token
> data: nham
> 0.000 0 435207 0 non-token
> data: ntokens
> 0.000 0 1084290758 0 non-token
> data: oldest atime
> 0.000 0 1085525323 0 non-token
> data: newest atime
> 0.000 0 1085525334 0 non-token
> data: last journal sync atime
> 0.000 0 1084784968 0 non-token
> data: last expiry atime
> 0.000 0 345600 0 non-token
> data: last expire atime delta
> 0.000 0 189064 0 non-token
> data: last expire reduction count
>
> Would putting the bayes dirs in tmpfs increase the
> speed of the locking of the
> bayes-databases by SA?
>
> Regards,
>
> Eelco
>
> Robert Mena wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I replaced my exim+rav setup sunday with a
> > exim+ms+clamav+sa. Everything was ok, the load
> was
> > higher but the flow of the messages seemed smooth.
> >
> > Today I've noticed that the exim.in queue grew up
> to
> > 8000 messages. In the two previous days it never
> > exceeded 500. The out queue was higher yesterday
> (up
> > to 10K messages) despite the smoother behaviour so
> It
> > does not seem an attack or increased volume of
> > incoming spam.
> >
> > After I've switched off the spamassassin (still
> > mailscanner + clamav) the exim.in queue went from
> 8K
> > to 0 in a matter of minutes.
> >
> > Any ideas ?
> >
> > My setup
> > - Linux Fedora Core 1 - kernel
> 2.4.22-1.2188.nptlsmp
> > - mailscanner-4.30.3-2
> > - spamassassin-2.63-1
> > - exim 4.32
> > - clamav-0.70
> >
> > My General Configuration setup looks like this:
> >
> > Max SpamAssassin Size = 30000
> > Max Unscanned Bytes Per Scan = 0
> > Max Unsafe Bytes Per Scan = 50000000
> > Max Unscanned Messages Per Scan = 0
> > Max Unsafe Messages Per Scan = 100
> > Max Normal Queue Size = 5000
> >
> > My sa-learn dump:
> > 0.000 0 2 0 non-token
> > data: bayes db version
> > 0.000 0 8856 0 non-token
> > data: nspam
> > 0.000 0 8072 0 non-token
> > data: nham
> > 0.000 0 357214 0 non-token
> > data: ntokens
> > 0.000 0 1000210340 0 non-token
> > data: oldest atime
> > 0.000 0 1085521354 0 non-token
> > data: newest atime
> > 0.000 0 1085521390 0 non-token
> > data: last journal sync atime
> > 0.000 0 1085409209 0 non-token
> > data: last expiry atime
> > 0.000 0 852711 0 non-token
> > data: last expire atime delta
> > 0.000 0 0 0 non-token
> > data: last expire reduction count
>
> -------------------------- MailScanner list
> ----------------------
> To leave, send leave mailscanner to
> jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk
> Before posting, please see the Most Asked Questions
> at
> http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/ and the archives
> at
> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger.
http://messenger.yahoo.com/
-------------------------- MailScanner list ----------------------
To leave, send leave mailscanner to jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk
Before posting, please see the Most Asked Questions at
http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/ and the archives at
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list