{Spam?} [39] kind of spam that slips through

[Brian Fistler]

On Sat, 2004-05-15 at 04:36, Shoval Tomer wrote:
> Hi all.
> 
> Messages like the attached one slip through MailScanner most of the
> time (over 90%)
> 
> Even though I use sa-learn to teach SA that they’re spam.
> 
>  
> 
> Could someone take a look at the message and find out why?
> 
> thanks
> 
[snip]

Your message scored 29+ here... see SA score below.
Check out adding rules_du_jour to your spamassassin configuration.

You can download it at http://sandgnat.com/rdj/rules_du_jour 

Brian

X-kimnbrian.com-MailScanner-SpamCheck:  spam, SpamAssassin
(score=39.186, required 6, autolearn=spam, BIZ_TLD 0.10, DRUGS_ANXIETY
0.01, DRUGS_ANXIETY_EREC 1.00, DRUGS_ANXIETY_OBFU 1.00, DRUGS_DEPRESSION
0.01, DRUGS_DEPR_EREC 1.00, DRUGS_DIET 0.01, DRUGS_DIET_EREC 1.00,
DRUGS_DIET_PAIN 0.50, DRUGS_ERECTILE 1.00, DRUGS_ERECTILE_OBFU 1.50,
DRUGS_MANYKINDS 1.00, DRUGS_MUSCLE 0.01, DRUGS_PAIN 0.01,
DRUGS_PAIN_EREC 1.00, DRUGS_PAIN_OBFU 1.00, DRUGS_SLEEP 0.01,
DRUGS_SLEEP_EREC 0.50, FCS_URI_NODOTS 0.35, HTML_MESSAGE 0.10,
J_BACKHAIR_11 1.00, J_BACKHAIR_12 1.00, J_BACKHAIR_13 1.00,
J_BACKHAIR_14 1.00, J_BACKHAIR_21 1.00, J_BACKHAIR_22 1.00,
J_BACKHAIR_23 1.00, J_BACKHAIR_24 1.00, J_BACKHAIR_25 1.00,
J_BACKHAIR_31 1.00, J_BACKHAIR_32 1.00, J_BACKHAIR_36 1.00,
J_BACKHAIR_41 1.00, J_BACKHAIR_51 1.00, J_CHICKENPOX_21 0.60,
MY_HTML_OBFU 0.33, SPAMCOP_URI_RBL 3.00, TW_JG 0.08, TW_PV 0.08)

-------------------------- MailScanner list ----------------------
To leave, send    leave mailscanner    to jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk
Before posting, please see the Most Asked Questions at
http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/     and the archives at
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html