tao Linux

[Brent]

Actually it is using the rh es kernels:

CentOS box
rpm -qa | grep kernel
kernel-pcmcia-cs-3.1.31-13
kernel-utils-2.4-8.37.1
kernel-2.4.21-9.0.1.EL.c0
kernel-source-2.4.21-9.0.1.EL.c0

rh es srpm mirror:
kernel-2.4.21-9.0.1.EL.src.rpm           17-Feb-2004 14:23


I have Symantec manhunt, the current version of which is designed for rh es
3, running right of the box on a centos-3 server.  I've been happy with it.
For me it was between centos or tao, but I think I went with Centos because
it had a larger following at the time, and released the patches faster.

Brent


-----Original Message-----
From: MailScanner mailing list [mailto:MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf
Of Kevin Spicer
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2004 3:03 PM
To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: tao Linux

On Mon, 2004-05-03 at 19:42, Brent wrote:
> You may also want to look at CentOS, its another popular rebuild of rh es.
>
>
http://www.centos.org/index.php?option=displaypage&Itemid=62&op=page&SubMenu
> =

Interesting, a brief comparison of the web sites for Whitebox, Tao and
CentOS reveals the following significant differences between the
distros.

Whitebox - packages built for i386 (but with i686 instruction order
optimisation).  Additional kernels available for i686/athlon etc.

Tao - packages built for i686 (at least I think thats what they are
saying)

CentOS - Uses vanilla kernels, couldn't spot what optimisations they
were compiling with.

It strikes me that using vanilla kernels doesn't really make a lot of
sense, surely the Red Hat patch set is one of the key selling points of
RHEL??  One of the reasons I'm interested in using one of the above is
so I can get a long product life span. with the added benefit of being
able to use the additional HP specific drivers that HP makes available
for their hardware.  I'm erring towards Tao, but I'd be interested in
any comparisons.




BMRB International
http://www.bmrb.co.uk
+44 (0)20 8566 5000
_________________________________________________________________
This message (and any attachment) is intended only for the
recipient and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material.  If you have received this in error, please contact the
sender and delete this message immediately.  Disclosure, copying
or other action taken in respect of this email or in
reliance on it is prohibited.  BMRB International Limited
accepts no liability in relation to any personal emails, or
content of any email which does not directly relate to our
business.

-------------------------- MailScanner list ----------------------
To leave, send    leave mailscanner    to jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk
Before posting, please see the Most Asked Questions at
http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/     and the archives at
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html

-------------------------- MailScanner list ----------------------
To leave, send    leave mailscanner    to jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk
Before posting, please see the Most Asked Questions at
http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/     and the archives at
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html