Black List From: UserA To: UserB {Scanned}

[Julian Field]

At 20:17 31/03/2004, you wrote:
>Mr. Field,
>
>I, too, am grateful for the response. Cloudiness does not always hang around
>my head, believe it or not, but I have been using the wrong format since the
>FromAndTo came out (FromAndTo: plus two addresses plus a yes or no). There
>was never a complaint in the logs.

Oops, sorry about that, it should have complained about it. Will check some
time...

>As always, thank you for the fine program and quick responses.

No problem. Glad you like it.


>Steve Campbell
>campbell at cnpapers.com
>Charleston Newspapers
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Julian Field" <mailscanner at ECS.SOTON.AC.UK>
>To: <MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
>Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 1:17 PM
>Subject: Re: Black List From: UserA To: UserB {Scanned}
>
>
> > At 19:04 31/03/2004, you wrote:
> > >Mr. Field or anybody,
> > >
> > >I hate to be so cloudy, but when did the From: .... and To: .... come
>into
> > >being?
> >
> > 4.26.8.
> >
> > >  And what is the difference, then between the two (FromAndTo: and the
> > >"From:  ... and To: ...). Is there restrictions on where they can be
>used?
> >
> > FromAndTo: only takes 1 address. It is used for catching internal mail,
>e.g.
> > FromAndTo: domain1.com no
> > It will catch mail which is going from domain1.com to domain1.com.
> >
> > condition and condition
> > obviously takes 2 addresses. So you can catch mail going from 1 domain to
>a
> > different domain, for example.
> >
> > You should be able to use either one in any ruleset.
> >
> >
> > >Thank you very much.
> > >
> > >
> > >Steve Campbell
> > >campbell at cnpapers.com
> > >Charleston Newspapers
> > >
> > >
> > >----- Original Message -----
> > >From: "Julian Field" <mailscanner at ECS.SOTON.AC.UK>
> > >To: <MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
> > >Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 12:43 PM
> > >Subject: Re: Black List From: UserA To: UserB {Scanned}
> > >
> > >
> > > > At 18:38 31/03/2004, you wrote:
> > > > >Oops,
> > > > >
> > > > >what I meant was:
> > > > >
> > > > >Is this right? How does this differ from
> > > > >
> > > > >FromAndTo:     UserA at domain.com    UserB at 2nd.domain.com     yes
> > > >
> > > > That doesn't work.
> > > >
> > > > >and is this also a solution?
> > > >
> > > > No.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >Sorry for the quick finger.
> > > > >
> > > > >Steve Campbell
> > > > >campbell at cnpapers.com
> > > > >Charleston Newspapers
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >----- Original Message -----
> > > > >From: "Julian Field" <mailscanner at ECS.SOTON.AC.UK>
> > > > >To: <MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
> > > > >Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 12:08 PM
> > > > >Subject: Re: Black List From: UserA To: UserB {Scanned}
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > At 18:04 31/03/2004, you wrote:
> > > > > > >Hello All, Question. Can I black list a internal user from
>sending an
> > > > >email to
> > > > > > >a signal address/User?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >Black-list
> > > > > > >From: spam at spam.com yes
> > > > > > >From: UserA at domain.com To: UserB at 2nd.domain.com yes
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >I know this doesn't work but is there a way? Any Ideas?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You are almost there, just put
> > > > > > From: UserA at domain.com and To: UserB at 2nd.domain.com yes
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >Thanks, David
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >Open WebMail Project (http://openwebmail.org)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >--
> > > > > > >This message has been scanned for viruses and
> > > > > > >dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> > > > > > >believed to be clean.
> > > > > > >MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support.
> > > > > > >Please contact support at computer-medic.us if you have
> > > > > > >questions about this email.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Julian Field
> > > > > > www.MailScanner.info
> > > > > > Professional Support Services at www.MailScanner.biz
> > > > > > MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support
> > > > > > PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Julian Field
> > > > www.MailScanner.info
> > > > Professional Support Services at www.MailScanner.biz
> > > > MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support
> > > > PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654
> >
> > --
> > Julian Field
> > www.MailScanner.info
> > Professional Support Services at www.MailScanner.biz
> > MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support
> > PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654

--
Julian Field
www.MailScanner.info
Professional Support Services at www.MailScanner.biz
MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support
PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654