Virus Scanning & Spam Checks rulesets

[Julian Field]

It's just the logging saying it's doing it. Without evaluating the rules
for every single message in the batch, you can't say for sure that you're
not going to do any spam checks until you've done them. It doesn't seem
worth the extra slow-down just for the logging message.

At 14:35 31/03/2004, you wrote:
>Hi folks,
>
>I want to allow e-mail from a specific sender address to bypass both
>virus scanning and spam checks, so I've created a couple of rulesets
>and specified them under
>
>Virus Scanning =
>Spam Checks =
>
>However, the logging that MailScanner is producing looks odd:
>
>Mar 31 14:26:53 mallard MailScanner[30551]: New Batch: Forwarding 1
>unscanned messages, 592 bytes
>Mar 31 14:26:53 mallard MailScanner[30551]: Spam Checks: Starting
>Mar 31 14:26:54 mallard MailScanner[30551]: Unscanned: Delivered 1
>messages
>Mar 31 14:26:55 mallard MailScanner[30551]: Virus and Content Scanning:
>Starting
>
>i.e. it still says that it's starting Spam Checks and then produces a
>spurious Virus and Content Scanning message afterwards.
>
>This is MailScanner version 4.28.5.
>
>--
>Mike Zanker
>Northampton, UK
>PGP Public Key: pgp at zanker.org

--
Julian Field
www.MailScanner.info
MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support

PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654