sendmail dnsbl vs MS

[Ugo Bellavance]

>-----Message d'origine-----
>De : Greg Krzeszkowski [mailto:gregk at INFOSECSOLUTIONS.COM.AU]
>Envoyé : 29 mars, 2004 23:27
>À : MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
>Objet : Re: sendmail dnsbl vs MS
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Ugo Bellavance
>Sent: 30/03/2004 1:25:09 PM
>To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
>Subject: Re: sendmail dnsbl vs MS
>
>> >-----Message d'origine-----
>> >De : Greg Krzeszkowski [mailto:gregk at INFOSECSOLUTIONS.COM.AU]
>> >Envoyé : 29 mars, 2004 22:07
>> >À : MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
>> >Objet : sendmail dnsbl vs MS
>> >
>> >
>* SNIPPED *
>
>> >Mar 30 13:03:57 localhost sendmail[11731]: 
>> >ruleset=check_relay, arg1=[192.168.1.254], arg2=192.168.1.254, 
>> >relay=[192.168.1.254], reject=451 4.7.1 Temporary Lookup 
>> >failure for 192.168.1.254 in sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org
>> 
>> This shows a different problem.  This means that it checks 
>mail that originates from your lan.  It shouldn't.
>> 
>> 
>
>Any idea why this would be occurring?   It's a fairly stock 
>standard implementation (incoming and outgoing email)...

Using RBLs in sendmail is not really "stock".  And it is not really MailScanner related.  It is a sendmail-specific topic and since I don't use RBLS in sendmail, I can't help you further.  Sorrry,

>
>Greg Krzeszkowski
>