ClamAV + MailScanner

[Ryan Pitt]

Interesting...

Alan wrote:

>Last night I had a nice backlog of 30,000 emails in the sendmail inqueue,
>so I thought it was a good time to compare ClamAV to ClamAVmodule.
>
>First I ran MS with just ClamAV as the antivirus scanner, and then
>ClamAVmodule as the only scanner.
>
>It took MS 9 minutes to process 1500 messages from the inqueue with ClamAV,
>and it then took MS 13 minutes to process another 1500 messages with
>ClamAVmodule.
>
>I reproduced this a few times, so I would state that ClamAV is faster than
>its perl module scanner.
>
>
>


--
This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner,
and is believed to be clean.