OT: SPF Anyone?

[Martin Hepworth]

David

SA 2.70 is now to be 3.0

I've been monitoring the SAusers list and although there's alot of talk
about 3.0 there's no dates been mentioned AFAIK.

looking at the devel archives can;t see anything there either..

--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300


David Lee wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Mar 2004, Rose, Bobby wrote:
>
>
>>Same here/  I updated DNS I January but I'll proably use SpamAssassin
>>support for it instead.  You know there are going to be a lot of domains
>>out there that won't have SPF records so it makes sense to use a scoring
>>method first.   The score and MailScanner's high spam action should be
>>enough to implement an SPF solution.  Granted MailScanner will need to
>>be updated for SA 3.0 to work, but it's only the SA.pm that'll need
>>updated to use different calls.  But that all is still a ways off.
>
>
> According to the SPF website http://www.pobox.com/ intro page at
> http://www.pobox.com/intro.html:
>   "SPF expects to see support in SpamAssassin 2.70"
> (rather than the 3.0 stated above).
>
> Next question (veering off-topic perhaps): does anyone know approximately
> when SA2.70 is due?  (And whether SPF's statement about SA2.70 is correct?
> And what the SA/SPF rules and initial scores might look like?)
>
>
>
> --
>
> :  David Lee                                I.T. Service          :
> :  Systems Programmer                       Computer Centre       :
> :                                           University of Durham  :
> :  http://www.dur.ac.uk/t.d.lee/            South Road            :
> :                                           Durham                :
> :  Phone: +44 191 334 2752                  U.K.                  :

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support.