F-prot update

[Kai Schaetzl]

Dan Hollis wrote on         Sat, 6 Mar 2004 04:54:05 -0800:

> such rejection are RFC violation.

so what? if your mailer complies to RFC and uses a correct EHLO, the
mailer has no problem to deliver, if the virus doesn't comply to RFC I
can't help it.

>
> > ( a lot of names like SAM, or
> > Bill, or SERVER), or no Message-Id, etc. The MTA can stop a lot
> > of both spam and viruses if you just work on your access lists a
>
> your MTA is non RFC compliant in this case.
>

how does using an access list violate an RFC?


Kai

--

Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
IE-Center: http://ie5.de & http://msie.winware.org