Symlinks or no Symlinks (was: Re: W32/Bagle-Zip)

[John Rudd]

Julian Field wrote:
>
> At 23:03 04/03/2004, you wrote:

> >
> >So, why must it be the absolute path?  What is it that you think will
> >break/happen if it's not the absolute path?
>
> The output of some virus scanners (notably McAfee for an example)


Ah, so the fact that we use sophos here is probably the reason symlinks
aren't a problem for us.  Good to know.


Thanks,

John