MTA preferences for use with MailScanner
Raymond Dijkxhoorn
raymond at PROLOCATION.NET
Thu Jul 29 14:59:46 IST 2004
Hi!
> | I don't like Sendmail very much, it's a memory hog if you get lots of
> | simultaneous connections (but it's really fast when you don't).
> Could you (maybe off list) tell me how you came to that conclusion? I am
> curious, because we do lots of high volume sendmail installs and with
> recent releases we cannot really relate to the issue you describe. I
> would be very interested in exchanging your experiences and integrating
> them into my knowlegde portfolio :)
We have a mixed setup currently, and the Exim boxes indeed do perform a
lot better then the sendmail ones, with about the same processing load
(number of messages).
Sendmail doesnt do bad, but Exim just does a little better. I was also
used to run zmail, since i previously worked for Sonera, they made
zmailer, so we run it on our production boxes a long time. But zmailer is
indeed not really simple to maintain...
Bye,
Raymond.
-------------------------- MailScanner list ----------------------
To leave, send leave mailscanner to jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk
Before posting, please see the Most Asked Questions at
http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/ and the archives at
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list