Suggestion box re spam scores

[Mike Andrews]

Julian Field <mailscanner at ECS.SOTON.AC.UK>
Sent by: MailScanner mailing list <MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
07/19/2004 11:57 AM
Please respond to
MailScanner mailing list <MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK>


To
MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
cc

Subject
Re: [MAILSCANNER] Suggestion box re spam scores






At 17:47 19/07/2004, you wrote:
>Bill Sholar - WebGusto <mailto:bill at WEBGUSTO.COM>
>     on Monday, July 19, 2004 3:41 AM said:
>
> > I suggest MS+SA report _score_ as nn, nn.n, or nn.nn, with leading
> > zeros, to allow such sorting.
>
>i would like to cast my vote for this also. i would prefer at least one
>decimal place if not two.

2 before and 2 after? Or do you want a printf format string?
Spam Score Format = %02.2f


=========== reply follows (and I HATE Lotus Notes!) =============

I think that %03.2f might be better; I really have seen spam with scores
over 100, not including
any artificially-large scores, but just managing to trip all the switches
as it went through.

--
Mike Andrews
Information Security
Technical Services Division
Oklahoma Dept. of Transportation
mandrews at odot.org

-------------------------- MailScanner list ----------------------
To leave, send    leave mailscanner    to jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk
Before posting, please see the Most Asked Questions at
http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/     and the archives at
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html