Logging scores of non-spam (patch)

Julian Field mailscanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk
Fri Jan 23 15:18:49 GMT 2004


At 15:04 23/01/2004, you wrote:
>On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 14:54:57 +0000, John Ireland wrote:
> > FWIW I patch SA.pm to include the
> > SpamAssassin 'autolearn=' field in the SpamCheck header so I can check the
> > Bayesian auto learning - the header changes from,
> >
> >     X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: spam, SpamAssassin (score=37.097,
> >         required 4, BAYES_99 5.40, BIZ_TLD 0.10,
> >         DATE_IN_FUTURE_12_24 3.33, DCC_CHECK 2.70, FORGED_OUTLOOK_TAGS ...
> > to,
> >
> >     X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: spam, SpamAssassin (score=37.097,
> >         required 4, autolearn=spam, BAYES_99 5.40, BIZ_TLD 0.10,
> >         DATE_IN_FUTURE_12_24 3.33, DCC_CHECK 2.70, FORGED_OUTLOOK_TAGS ...
> >
> > Would this be of general interest?
>
>Certainly sounds useful - I've often wondered if this was possible.
>Julian?

I think it would be better to leave it out altogether if it is "no" and
just list it for messages learned as "spam" and "not spam". I don't want
the users to have to wonder what "ham" is.

This will be in the next release.
--
Julian Field
www.MailScanner.info
MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support

PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654



More information about the MailScanner mailing list