Some messages not being spam scanned?
Mark Nienberg
mark at TIPPINGMAR.COM
Thu Jan 15 04:47:53 GMT 2004
Did you set this in mailscanner.conf?
# Do you want to always include the Spam Report in the SpamCheck
# header, even if the message wasn't spam?
# This can also be the filename of a ruleset.
Always Include SpamAssassin Report = yes
If you don't, then you won't see a report if it doesn't score more than
your spam threshold.
Mark
On Wednesday, January 14, 2004, at 05:06 PM, Andy Moran wrote:
> I removed the Infinite-Monkeys RBL.
>
> But I still get occasional messages with no Spam header as if
> MailScanners skipped it.. and I don't see any SpamAssassin timeout
> messages in the logs.
>
> Any other thoughts?
>
> --Andy
>
> Julian Field wrote:
>> Stop using Infinite-Monkeys. I don't think it exists any more.
>>
>> At 18:59 14/01/2004, you wrote:
>>
>>> I do have lots of "timed out" messages from MailScanner in my
>>> maillog,
>>> but they are all RBL Check timeouts l ike so:
>>>
>>> Jan 14 03:01:18 hermes MailScanner[1812]: RBL Check ORDB-RBL timed
>>> out
>>> and was killed, consecutive failure 1 of 7
>>> Jan 14 03:02:10 hermes MailScanner[7565]: RBL Check Infinite-Monkeys
>>> timed out and was killed, consecutive failure 1 of 7
>>>
>>> But it's never consecutive enough to disable those RBL checks for
>>> good..
>>> I don't see any "timed out" messages for SpamAssassin...
>>>
>>> Could these RBL timeouts cause MailScanner to skip the spamassassin
>>> test?
>>>
>>> --Andy
>>>
>>> Peter Bonivart wrote:
>>>
>>>> I know it's not because of the HABEAS headers because I get those as
>>>> well as the SA report. Could it be that you had a timeout from SA?
>>>> Look
>>>> for "timed out" in your mail log.
>>>>
>>>> /Peter Bonivart
>>>>
>>>> --Unix lovers do it in the Sun
>>>>
>>>> Sun Fire V210, Solaris 9, Sendmail 8.12.10, MailScanner 4.25-14,
>>>> SpamAssassin 2.61 + DCC 1.2.21, ClamAV 0.65 + GMP
>>>>
>>>> Andy Moran wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> One of our users suggested that perhaps MailScanner
>>>>> honored those Habeus headers.. I was almost insulted at the
>>>>> suggestion.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is there any way I can figure out why MailScanner isn't giving
>>>>> these a
>>>>> spam score?
>>
>>
>> --
>> Julian Field
>> www.MailScanner.info
>> Professional Support Services at www.MailScanner.biz
>> MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support
>> PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list