4.9 marked as spam.

[Baccari, Lou]

Julian,

 Thanks, that corrected the "Config Error:" problem, but mail from root still gets flagged as spam.

 I also tried removing SORBS-DNSBL from MailScanner.conf and mail from root passes.  I've provide the header below.

 As stated earlier I checked http://www.dnsbl.us.sorbs.net/cgi-bin/lookup?js&IP= and tested my servers there and they came up clean, i.e. 'No entry found'.  What could have happen since yesterday?  Is there an other means of testing SORBS-DNSBL list?

Lou.



==== Mail H =======

X-HPLC-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-HPLC-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-4.9, required 5,
        BAYES_00 -4.90)
X-HPLC-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-0.904, required 5,
        BAYES_30 -0.90)
X-PMX-Version: 4.1.1.86173




-----Original Message-----
From: MailScanner mailing list [mailto:MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK]On
Behalf Of Julian Field
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 11:13 AM
To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: 4.9 marked as spam.


At 16:05 12/01/2004, you wrote:
>Thanks,  I Tried your suggestion and I now see the following error:
>
>an 12 11:03:50 crl-ns1b MailScanner[20125]: Uninfected: Delivered 1 messages
>Jan 12 11:03:50 crl-ns1b MailScanner[20125]: New Batch: Scanning 1
>messages, 874 bytes
>Jan 12 11:03:50 crl-ns1b MailScanner[20125]: Config Error: Cannot match
>against  destination IP address when resolving configuration
>  option  "spamwhitelist"
>Jan 12 11:03:50 crl-ns1b MailScanner[20125]: Config Error: Cannot match
>against  destination IP address when resolving configuration
>  option  "spamwhitelist"

Sorry, my mistake. Put "From:" instead of "FromTo:" in both of those rules.


>=== spam.whitelist.rules =======
>#
>FromTo:   192.58.206.19                  yes
>FromTo:   16.11.1.22                    yes
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: MailScanner mailing list [mailto:MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK]On
>Behalf Of Julian Field
>Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 10:17 AM
>To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
>Subject: Re: 4.9 marked as spam.
>
>
>At 15:10 12/01/2004, you wrote:
> >Hello,
> >
> >It appears that today I can not send any mail to myself without it being
> >marked as spam. I even added myself to the white list and the problem
> >continues.  Any ideas?
> >
> >Lou.
> >
> >==== Mail H ============
> >
> >Subject: **SPAM** Restarted Named on
> >X-HPLC-MailScanner: Found to be clean
> >X-HPLC-MailScanner-SpamCheck: spam, SORBS-DNSBL, SpamAssassin (score=-4.9,
> >         required 5, BAYES_00 -4.90)
> >X-HPLC-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
> >X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
> >X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-0.001, required 5,
> >         BAYES_40 -0.00)
> >Return-Path: root at crl-ns1b.crl.dec.com
> >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Jan 2004 15:06:15.0627 (UTC)
> >FILETIME=[9FE379B0:01C3D91D]
> >
> >==== spam.whitelist.rules ============
> >
> >FromTo:   *@192.58.206.19                  yes
> >FromTo:   *@*192.58.206.19                  yes
> >FromTo:   *@16.11.1.22                     yes
> >FromTo:   *@*16.11.1.22                    yes
>
>You whitelist rules are wrong. You can whitelist IP addresses, but IP
>addresses and email addresses are totally different things. You should be
>using these lines instead:
>
>FromTo:   192.58.206.19                  yes
>FromTo:   16.11.1.22                     yes
>
>--
>Julian Field
>www.MailScanner.info
>MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support
>
>PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654

--
Julian Field
www.MailScanner.info
Professional Support Services at www.MailScanner.biz
MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support
PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654