One recipient per message (sendmail) pointer + question

[Michael Baird]

Heh, beware it really does make MailScanner work quite a bit harder, I
tried it and had to back off.

Regards
MIKE

> Many thanks for finding the FAQ entry. It saved me a bit of work at a very
> busy time!
>
> Sorry for the top posting but it seemed appropriate. You don't have to read
> the rest of the thread :>)
>
> Steve
>
> Stephen Swaney
> President
> Fortress Systems Ltd.
> Steve.Swaney at FSL.com
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: MailScanner mailing list [mailto:MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On
> > Behalf Of Walker Aumann
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 8:17 PM
> > To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> > Subject: One recipient per message (sendmail) pointer + question
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I know this was discussed recently, and Steve Swaney said he was going
> > to dig up an answer.  Well, I found this answer in the FAQ:
> >
> > http://www.sng.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailscanner/serve/cache/169.html
> >
> > Very nice, as I couldn't find documentation anywhere else on how to add
> > the appropriate options to the .m4 file (I'm really much more
> > comfortable hacking the .cf file, but I'm trying to be nice and
> > maintainable for anyone else who may have to deal with this stuff).
> >   However, I still have one problem:
> >
> > Feb 25 16:55:52 gw-sea sendmail[24296]: NOQUEUE: SYSERR(root): QueuePath
> > /var/spool/mqueue.in not subpath of QueueDirectory /var/spool/mqueue/
> >
> > This is coming from the outbound sendmail.
> >
> > I'd really like to do this with one .m4 file if at all possible.  Is it
> > at all possible?
> >
> > Walker
> >
> > --
> > This message has been scanned for viruses and
> > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> > believed to be clean.
> >
> > Fortress Systems Ltd.
> > www.fsl.com
> >
>
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by Fortress Secure Mail Gateway
> and was found to be clean.
>
> Fortress Systems Ltd. - http://www.fsl.com
>