One recipient per message (sendmail) pointer + question
mike at TC3NET.COM
Thu Feb 26 13:45:50 GMT 2004
Heh, beware it really does make MailScanner work quite a bit harder, I
tried it and had to back off.
> Many thanks for finding the FAQ entry. It saved me a bit of work at a very
> busy time!
> Sorry for the top posting but it seemed appropriate. You don't have to read
> the rest of the thread :>)
> Stephen Swaney
> Fortress Systems Ltd.
> Steve.Swaney at FSL.com
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: MailScanner mailing list [mailto:MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On
> > Behalf Of Walker Aumann
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 8:17 PM
> > To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> > Subject: One recipient per message (sendmail) pointer + question
> > Hi all,
> > I know this was discussed recently, and Steve Swaney said he was going
> > to dig up an answer. Well, I found this answer in the FAQ:
> > http://www.sng.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailscanner/serve/cache/169.html
> > Very nice, as I couldn't find documentation anywhere else on how to add
> > the appropriate options to the .m4 file (I'm really much more
> > comfortable hacking the .cf file, but I'm trying to be nice and
> > maintainable for anyone else who may have to deal with this stuff).
> > However, I still have one problem:
> > Feb 25 16:55:52 gw-sea sendmail: NOQUEUE: SYSERR(root): QueuePath
> > /var/spool/mqueue.in not subpath of QueueDirectory /var/spool/mqueue/
> > This is coming from the outbound sendmail.
> > I'd really like to do this with one .m4 file if at all possible. Is it
> > at all possible?
> > Walker
> > --
> > This message has been scanned for viruses and
> > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> > believed to be clean.
> > Fortress Systems Ltd.
> > www.fsl.com
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by Fortress Secure Mail Gateway
> and was found to be clean.
> Fortress Systems Ltd. - http://www.fsl.com
More information about the MailScanner