Would stripping HTML before calling SA help?

[Hancock, Scott]

I received an email with this code.
 
<BR><B>Subject:</B> chinch gumbo instill fraud<BR><B>Over 300,000 
mal<GOSSAMER>es in the world used our product for last 
year!<BR>Ama<CARRION>zing, PERM</DISCRETE>ANENT RES</FIERY>ULTS! The
most 
popular solution for Pe<FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 1px">g</FONT>nis
Enla<FONT 
style="FONT-SIZE: 1px">b</FONT>rgement<BR></B><BR>
<LI>10<FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 1px">c</FONT>0% safe he<FONT 
style="FONT-SIZE: 1px">a</FONT>rbal fo<FONT style="FONT-SIZE:
1px">m</FONT>rmula 
and do<FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 1px">u</FONT>ctor aproved 
<LI>Inc<BEHEST>rease Yo</SHOPKEEP>ur Pe<FONT style="FONT-SIZE:
1px">b</FONT>nis 
Wid<BUCKTHORN>th (Gi</SATELLITE>rth) By 20% 
<LI>Ga<PRACTICABLE>in 3</FAT>+ Full Inc<FONT style="FONT-SIZE:
1px">o</FONT>hes 
In Length 
<LI>Stop Pre<FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 1px">v</FONT>mature Ejac<FONT 
style="FONT-SIZE: 1px">l</FONT>ulation! 
<LI>Prod<DEFLECT>uce Stronger, Ro</CONCEDE>ck Hard Er<FONT 
style="FONT-SIZE: 1px">h</FONT>ections<BR><BR><A
 
 
This was the SA score
 
MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=0.101,
            required 5, HTML_MESSAGE 0.00, MIME_HTML_ONLY 0.10)
 
 
I'm not sure if strip html find the "v" in this string.  "FONT-SIZE:
1px">v</FONT>mature
 
I am a very small site and have the horsepower for the processing.  
 
Any opinions?  Or alternate suggestions?  Any favorite SA rules site
that I should be updating my SA against?
 
My mailscanner is a relay for exchange.  Would going through the Bayes /
public folder / Spam mailbox implementation find this SPAM?
 
The SPAM is getting deep.  
 
MS 4.23
SA 2.63
 
Thanks
 
Scott
 
 
 
 
 
Scott Hancock
Morgan Construction Co.
v. 508-849-6492
f. 508-755-6140
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20040224/9e6ce8c7/attachment.html