Wierd words for spam filter

[Martin Hepworth]

Matt

should be something recent..

'ls' says Feb 18....comments say 0.52


hmm hang on, it's root only readable - d'oh..

something else to check - bayes DB AND custom rule sets need to be
read-able by the MailScanner user....;-)


--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300


Matt Kettler wrote:
> At 04:57 AM 2/20/2004, Martin Hepworth wrote:
>
>> try the antidrug ruleset at
>> http://mywebpages.comcast.net/mkettler/sa/antidrug.cf
>>
>> having said that I'm running it and it didn't trigger it, but this rule
>> did...
>
>
> What version of antidrug are you using Martin? 0.43?
>
> Using 0.52 David's post triggered a lot of rules:
>
>         LOCAL_DRUGS_ANXIETY 0.01,
>         LOCAL_DRUGS_ANXIETY_MALEDYS 1.00
>         LOCAL_DRUGS_MALEDYSFUNCTION 1.00,
>         LOCAL_DRUGS_MALEDYSFUNCTION_OBFU 0.50
>          LOCAL_DRUGS_MANYKINDS 1.00,
>         LOCAL_DRUGS_MUSCLE 0.01
>         LOCAL_DRUGS_SLEEP 0.01,
>
> 0.5x is a very significant improvement in hit-rate over 0.43. I've added
> the ability to deal with irregular gapping patterns like the ones used
> Daniel's message.
>
> body LOCAL_OBFU_VGR looks painfully slow to execute.
>
> [\x01-\x2F\\\^_`\|\x7F-\xA1\xA4-\xA8\xAB-\xAD\xAF-\xB1\xB4\xB7-\xBB\xBF\xF7]?
>
>
> Why not just use \W? here... It would be easier to read. Why exclude so
> many individual characters over \x7F?

**********************************************************************

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept
for the presence of computer viruses and is believed to be clean.

**********************************************************************