For those of us that feel strongly that email should be a reliable transport medium.

[Dustin Baer]

Julian Field wrote:
>
> At 20:46 10/02/2004, you wrote:
> >Of course it is. But he's serving "high profile customers" whom obviously
> >are more important than the rest of us slags!
>
> Now now, people. Let's all remain calm and polite please...

This has been one of the most entertaining threads in the past couple of
days!

> I think this thread is best considered closed for now.
> It's clearly a debate which is going to run and run, I may have to put the
> "bounce" option to a vote.
> But in the meantime, does anyone have any good ideas for a happy medium,
> such as enabling it but not documenting it, or producing a nasty log
> message if it is used, or something like that?
> All constructive ideas are most welcome.

How about forcing an additional header (X-%org-name%-MailScanner-bounce)
to go along with the bounces?

Dustin
--
Dustin Baer
Unix Administrator/Postmaster
Information Handling Services
15 Inverness Way East
Englewood, CO 80112
303-397-2836