For those of us that feel strongly that email should be a rel iable transport medium.

[Kevin Miller]

Well, you could also generate an autobounce to local postmaster too - make
'em eat their own dogfood as the saying goes.  No option to turn it off of
course!  <g>

Feeling ornery today.  Must be something in the water...

...Kevin
--
Kevin Miller                Registered Linux User No: 307357
CBJ MIS Dept.               Network Systems Administrator, Mail
Administrator
155 South Seward Street     ph: (907) 586-0242
Juneau, Alaska 99801        fax: (907 586-4500


>-----Original Message-----
>From: Julian Field [mailto:mailscanner at ECS.SOTON.AC.UK]
>Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 11:57 AM
>To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
>Subject: Re: For those of us that feel strongly that email should be a
>reliable transport medium.
>
>
>At 20:46 10/02/2004, you wrote:
>>Of course it is. But he's serving "high profile customers"
>whom obviously
>>are more important than the rest of us slags!
>
>Now now, people. Let's all remain calm and polite please...
>
>I think this thread is best considered closed for now.
>It's clearly a debate which is going to run and run, I may
>have to put the
>"bounce" option to a vote.
>But in the meantime, does anyone have any good ideas for a
>happy medium,
>such as enabling it but not documenting it, or producing a nasty log
>message if it is used, or something like that?
>All constructive ideas are most welcome.
>--
>Julian Field
>www.MailScanner.info
>Professional Support Services at www.MailScanner.biz
>MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support
>PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654
>