4.26.7, bayes rebuild, confused. -- 4.26.8

Jeff A. Earickson jaearick at COLBY.EDU
Mon Feb 2 15:42:36 GMT 2004


Doh!  Sorry.  I had commented my change in the .conf file, then forgot
to make it.

Soooo....  With "Rebuild Bayes Every = 0", I guess we still need
to run our Bayes-rebuild cron jobs until all this gets sorted out,
right?

Jeff

On Mon, 2 Feb 2004, Julian Field wrote:

> Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 15:32:49 +0000
> From: Julian Field <mailscanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk>
> To: MailScanner mailing list <MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
> Cc: Jeff A. Earickson <jaearick at colby.edu>
> Subject: Re: 4.26.7, bayes rebuild, confused. -- 4.26.8
>
> I just fell foul of not having "Log Spam = yes" so you might want to
> double-check that.
> It appears to be logging fine on a Solaris 2.8 box.
>
> At 15:08 02/02/2004, you wrote:
> >Julian,
> >
> >    Popped 4.26.8 into place, let it run for a few minutes (Sol 9, SA
> >2.63, Razor).  No more complaints about Bayes, but no SpamAssassin
> >messages either.  I ran a batch in debug mode for both MS and SA, and
> >it looked like stuff in the debug batch got tagged by SA:
> >
> >debug: is spam? score=10.95 required=5
> >tests=BAYES_20,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,MIME_MISSING_BOUNDARY,MISSING_MIMEOLE,MSGID_FROM_MTA_SHORT,NO_REAL_NAME,PRIORITY_NO_NAME,RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100,RAZOR2_CHECK
> >
> >but nothing in the syslog regarding SA.  I also set the log level
> >for razor to 4 and razor is busy.  How to check it 4.26.8 is really
> >using SA, if nothing appears in syslog?  I'm back to running 4.25-14.
> >
> >Jeff Earickson
> >Colby College
> >
> >On Mon, 2 Feb 2004, Julian Field wrote:
> >
> > > Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 14:06:40 +0000
> > > From: Julian Field <mailscanner at ECS.SOTON.AC.UK>
> > > Reply-To: MailScanner mailing list <MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
> > > To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> > > Subject: Re: [MAILSCANNER] 4.26.7, bayes rebuild, confused. -- 4.26.8
> > >
> > > I have just posted version 4.26.8.
> > >
> > > The problem did not appear on Linux, but does appear on Solaris. You can
> > > now disable all the relevant code by setting
> > >
> > > Rebuild Bayes Every = 0
> > >
> > > I will look into fixing this as a priority, but it is highly OS-specific
> > > and may even be Perl-version specific. It refuses to lock a file it has
> > > just successfully opened, but seems happy when I do it elsewhere :-(
> > >
> > > Jules.
> > >
> > > P.S. thanks for your patience....
> > >
> > > At 10:23 02/02/2004, you wrote:
> > > >Inevitably I put a config name wrong in that one.
> > > >
> > > >At 09:40 02/02/2004, you wrote:
> > > >>Please could you try the attached SA.pm and see if it helps.
> > > >>
> > > >>Changes:
> > > >>         - Set "Rebuild Bayes Every = 0" should disable all this code.
> > > >>         - Locking code changed to more closely match the virus scanner
> > > >>locking code.
> > > >>
> > > >>The trouble is, it all works for me. But that's on a Linux system,
> > and the
> > > >>underlying locking behaviour may well be different on Solaris.
> > > >>
> > > >>At 07:56 02/02/2004, you wrote:
> > > >>>Hello,
> > > >>>
> > > >>>I have the same behaviour with the rebuild of bayes database and I
> > get it
> > > >>>every time MailScanner is launched.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>To avoid the "Skipping", I have to "manually" remove the lock file
> > > >>>(for me it's not important since I do not use bayes !)
> > > >>>
> > > >>>In SA.pm, the lock file is created before the test on "$RebuildBayes"
> > > >>>and the lock is removed only if the bayes database has been rebuild.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>If $RebuildBayes == 0, the lock will never be removed.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>if $RebuildBAYES <> 0, it seems that the rebuild on solaris don't finish
> > > >>>or don't begin ???
> > > >>>
> > > >>>        I see the "Skipping" line in the logfile but I don't see any
> > line
> > > >>>        such as "SpamAssassin Bayes database rebuild preparing" even
> > with
> > > >>>        $RebuildBAYES <> 0
> > > >>>
> > > >>>--
> > > >>>-- Pascal --
> > > >>>           --
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>--
> > > >>Julian Field
> > > >>www.MailScanner.info
> > > >>MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support
> > > >>
> > > >>PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >--
> > > >Julian Field
> > > >www.MailScanner.info
> > > >MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support
> > > >
> > > >PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Julian Field
> > > www.MailScanner.info
> > > MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support
> > >
> > > PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654
> > >
>
> --
> Julian Field
> www.MailScanner.info
> MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support
>
> PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654
>



More information about the MailScanner mailing list