confusion on spam score number format

[Jeff A. Earickson]

<x-flowed>
Thanks.  Patch applied.  Now I will have to wait several hours for
more spam to hit my mailbox before I can see if it works...
Seriously...  So much of our spam goes over the high spam score of
10 and gets deleted anymore that I get very few in the range of
5-10 that actually gets delivered.  I only get about 6/day this
way...  This is how good MailScanner really is!

Jeff Earickson

On Fri, 20 Aug 2004, Julian Field wrote:

> Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 15:25:30 +0100
> From: Julian Field <mailscanner at ECS.SOTON.AC.UK>
> Reply-To: MailScanner mailing list <MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
> To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> Subject: Re: confusion on spam score number format
>
> I screwed up.
> Please apply the attached (very short) patch to Message.pm.
>
> At 14:45 20/08/2004, you wrote:
>> X-Colby-MailScanner-SpamScore: 8
>>
>> But I have:
>>
>> Spam Score Number Format = %6.2f
>>
>> so I was expecting:
>>
>> X-Colby-MailScanner-SpamScore: 8.08
>
> ------------------------ MailScanner list ------------------------
> To unsubscribe, email jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk with the words:
> 'leave mailscanner' in the body of the email.
> Before posting, read the MAQ (http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/) and
> the archives (http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html).
>

------------------------ MailScanner list ------------------------
To unsubscribe, email jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk with the words:
'leave mailscanner' in the body of the email.
Before posting, read the MAQ (http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/) and
the archives (http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html).
</x-flowed>