SURBL installation

[Drew Marshall]

<x-flowed>
Peter Bonivart wrote:

> 4. I edited your cf-file to use the bitmask-combined multi-list instead
> since that's makes more efficient use of net resources. Less lookups,
> better cache hit rate. You may want to change the included file since
> SpamCopURI supports bitmasked results as of version 0.20.

Peter

I have just moved to the bit masked list but I can't find any .cf file
examples to check my syntax. I am getting hits but I'm not convinced for
any combined results (e.g. a return of 127.0.0.6 being a 'hit' on 2
lists). Is there any chance you could give some examples of what the
surbl_url.cf should look like for the multi-list (like do I have to list
the multiple options also or will SpamCopURI do that for me?)

Thanks

Drew

--
In line with our policy, this message has
been scanned for viruses and dangerous
content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
www.themarshalls.co.uk/policy

-------------------------- MailScanner list ----------------------
To leave, send    leave mailscanner    to jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk
Before posting, please see the Most Asked Questions at
http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/     and the archives at
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html
</x-flowed>