[OT] Re: MTA preferences for use with MailScanner

[greyhair]

<x-flowed>
Yes, I, too, am curious of how many people send 4.3 TB messages via
email?  Also, does it really make it a better MTA to have the
ability to handle >2^32 byte files?

humbly,
greyhair[ed]

9.8hrs over a 1 gigabit connection, right?

Drew Marshall wrote:
> On Wed, August 4, 2004 9:43, Julian Field said:
>
>>But it does all mean you can have a message more than 2^32 bytes long.
>>Where would we be without support for 4.3 terabyte messages?
>
>
> Being one of the definant Postfix users (From MailScanner's point of view
> becasue I use Postfix and Postfix's point of view because I use MS) :-) I
> would just like to ask if any one has a 4.3Tb message NOT to send it to me
> to test the theory. The idea of waiting for just under a week for it to
> arrive and then have it melt my disk array would not be fun :-D
>
> TIA
>
> Drew
>
>
> --
> In line with our policy, this message has
> been scanned for viruses and dangerous
> content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
> www.themarshalls.co.uk/policy
>
> -------------------------- MailScanner list ----------------------
> To leave, send    leave mailscanner    to jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk
> Before posting, please see the Most Asked Questions at
> http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/     and the archives at
> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html
>

-------------------------- MailScanner list ----------------------
To leave, send    leave mailscanner    to jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk
Before posting, please see the Most Asked Questions at
http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/     and the archives at
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html
</x-flowed>