starting errors on suse with latest Version
Marcel Blenkers
marcel at IRC-ADDICTS.DE
Mon Aug 2 15:52:16 IST 2004
Hi there,
as the others Problems only are due to the wrong Version downloaded (Red
Hat) my little Problem still exists ;)
Got any ideas for that?
Or my Problem with this Link-Errors?
Greetings
Marcel
On Mon, 2 Aug 2004, Stephen Swaney wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: MailScanner mailing list [mailto:MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On
> > Behalf Of Julian Field
> > Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 9:18 AM
> > To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> > Subject: Re: starting errors on suse with latest Version
> >
> > At 13:24 02/08/2004, you wrote:
> > >I am working on two SuSE installs on SuSE 8.1 (sendmail) and 9+
> > (Postfix)and
> > >there were four problems that I remember encountering with the
> > MailScanner
> > >init script.
> > >
> > >1. The script was installed in /etc/init.d/init.d/MailScanner. I had to
> > move
> > >it to /etc/init.d and remove the then empty directory /etc/init.d/init.d/
> >
> > I have just checked the latest RPM, and it definitely appears to be in
> > /etc/init.d/MailScanner.
> >
> > >2. There were permission problems with the sendmail.pid files. I think
> > >simply removing the existing pid files solved the problem.
> >
> > Don't know about this one.
> >
> > >3. SuSU uses different function names for the Red Hat "success" function.
> > In
> > >SuSE it's "log_success_msg".
> >
> > The SuSE init.d script does not call "success" anywhere.
> >
> > >4. The ". /etc/sysconfig/network/" call doesn't work. On SuSE this is a
> > >directory.
> >
> > That's why it's not in the SuSE build. It doesn't ever call it.
> >
> > Please can you confirm that you are using the SuSE distribution of
> > MailScanner, and a recent one at that, as the mailscanner*rpm file in
> > there
> > is very different to the RedHat one.
> > --
> > Julian Field
> > www.MailScanner.info
> > MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support
>
> Silly mistake. If you use the RH RPM on SuSE by mistake you'll get exactly
> the errors I list above.
>
> Sorry for the Bother.
>
> Stephen Swaney
> President
> Fortress Systems Ltd.
> Steve.Swaney at FSL.com
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
> Fortress Systems Ltd.
> www.fsl.com
>
> -------------------------- MailScanner list ----------------------
> To leave, send leave mailscanner to jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk
> Before posting, please see the Most Asked Questions at
> http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/ and the archives at
> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html
>
-------------------------- MailScanner list ----------------------
To leave, send leave mailscanner to jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk
Before posting, please see the Most Asked Questions at
http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/ and the archives at
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list