OT: Re: tao Linux

[Ugo Bellavance]

Rob Poe wrote:
> If WhiteBox has achieved it's goal (and why not, it's OSS, right?) and
> is 100% binary compatible to RHEL - how can it NOT be mature?
>
> I'm struggling right now, as Im building a new master server and don't
> want to use an unsupported version of RedHat (and I'm holding out on
> suse 9 until 9.1 comes out and is easily grabbable .. the new box
> doesn't see the network card under Suse 9.0 (intel motherboard)).
>
You can always go to fedora.  My home server is running MailScanner on
Fedora.

-------------------------- MailScanner list ----------------------
To leave, send    leave mailscanner    to jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk
Before posting, please see the Most Asked Questions at
http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/     and the archives at
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html