Logs vs. headers
David Lee
t.d.lee at DURHAM.AC.UK
Mon Apr 26 15:45:06 IST 2004
On Mon, 26 Apr 2004, Denis Beauchemin wrote:
> Kevin Brouelette wrote:
>
> >X-VarLog.net-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
> >X-VarLog.net-MailScanner-SpamCheck: spam, SpamAssassin (score=3.43,
> >required 2.5, BIZ_TLD 0.78, RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK 2.55, RCVD_IN_SORBS 0.10)
> >X-VarLog.net-MailScanner-SpamScore: sss
> >
> >
> >
> Kevin,
>
> You seem to have a dot in your org name (VarLog.net). This is a bad
> idea because it will get you into trouble on some systems.
This configuration problem seems to crop up several times on the list.
Could I suggest that MailScanner itself does a sanity check? When it
loads "MailScanner.conf" it could check that these various header
definitions (e.g. "Information Header" etc.) to ensure that there are no
glaring errors.
--
: David Lee I.T. Service :
: Systems Programmer Computer Centre :
: University of Durham :
: http://www.dur.ac.uk/t.d.lee/ South Road :
: Durham :
: Phone: +44 191 334 2752 U.K. :
-------------------------- MailScanner list ----------------------
To leave, send leave mailscanner to jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk
For further info about MailScanner, please see the Most Asked
Questions at http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/ and the archives
at http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list