Messages scanned twice by spamassassin

[Jadoo]

On Thu, 2004-04-08 at 14:14, John Wilcock wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Apr 2004 14:02:16 +0200, Jadoo wrote:
> > Indeed, what's the point of tagging mail as spam if it's already tagged
> > as such?
> >
> > I do understand you may want to test against viruses in case a message
> > was faked but spam ...?
>
> So you don't care that someone else's server, not under your control,
> may have generated a false positive?
>
> John.
No because those with a score above x get dumped straightaway.

The point is that my own remote servers have done their work so I can
check on their headers that it's from a trusted source.

Alfred