Spam Reports in mail headers
Gib Gilbertson Jr.
gib at TMISNET.COM
Tue Apr 6 14:49:35 IST 2004
Hi.
At 09:01 AM 4/6/2004 +0100, you wrote:
>Gib Gilbertson Jr. wrote:
>>Hi.
>>
>>I've dug through the archives and can't seem to find out if there is a
>>setting available that will do more than just turning on or off
>>Spamassassin scoring in e-mails.
>>
>>I have several clients that are on my whitelist who do not want spam
>>assassin scores in their e-mail headers.
>
>>>X-tmisnet-MailScanner: Found to be clean
>>>X-tmisnet-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam (whitelisted),
>>> SpamAssassin (score=24.1, required 7, autolearn=spam,
>>> BAD_CREDIT 0.41, BODY_OBFU_CIALIS 8.22, BODY_OBFU_PENIS 2.11,
>>> HTML_70_80 0.51, HTML_MESSAGE 0.10, MIME_HTML_ONLY 0.10,
>>> RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET 6.00, RCVD_IN_SPAMHAUS_SBL+XBL 6.00,
>>> RCVD_IN_UNCONFIRMED_DSBL 0.51, TW_EG 0.08, TW_GJ 0.08)
>>>X-UIDL: 0;+"!b!3"!<]d"!N1:"!
>
>I can't see why they don't want spamassassin scores in their messages.
>If you're convinced that what they're sending isn't going to be spam,
>why don't just change this setting:
>
># Do you want to check messages to see if they are spam?
># Note: If you switch this off then *no* spam checks will be done at all.
># This includes both MailScanner's own checks and SpamAssassin.
># If you want to just disable the "Spam List" feature then set
># "Spam List =" (i.e. an empty list) in the setting below.
># This can also be the filename of a ruleset.
>Spam Checks = yes
>
>After all, there's little point in scanning it with spamassassin if
>you're going to ignore the results.
Well, that seemed to take care of the problem. A ruleset the as the listed
spam.scores.rules mentioned above solved the problem. Now the messages are
not scanned and passed right through.
Thanks Richard!
gib
>--
>Richard Brown
>http://www.lawson-his.co.uk
>0870 99 070 52
Gib Gilbertson Jr.
Tierramiga Info Systems
619-287-8647 Support
http://www.tmisnet.com
San Diego's "Friendly ISP"
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list