SA Max Message Size
Julian Field
mailscanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk
Mon Apr 5 19:48:50 IST 2004
At 19:26 05/04/2004, you wrote:
># SpamAssassin is not very fast when scanning huge messages, so messages
># bigger than this value will be truncated to this length for SpamAssassin
># testing. The original message will not be affected by this. This value
># is a good compromise as very few spam messages are bigger than this.
>Max SpamAssassin Size = 90000
>
>(don't know how I missed this stnd option)
>
>If I am reading this correctly, SA will still scan a 100000 byte message
>but it will only scan the first 90000 bytes.
Correct. I set this limit to 10 or 20,000 myself. Doesn't seem to radically
affect the score and it's a whole lot faster.
> By nature of the second sentence, wouldn't it be a good idea to (have
> the option to) pass these messages unscanned rather than scan 90K (or 30K
> which seems to be the new default) of a message that is most likely not
> spam anyway?
The average size of a spam message is growing. My "truncation" approach
means you don't have to tweak it as spam gets bigger. I used to do it your
way but my way produced better results, so I changed it.
--
Julian Field
www.MailScanner.info
Professional Support Services at www.MailScanner.biz
MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support
PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list