Performance

[Julian Field]

At 23:39 02/04/2004, you wrote:
>So low-RAM situations should probably benefit from setting it to clamav
>instead?

Yes. But most importantly, if you haven't got much RAM then you should 
reduce the "Max Children" setting to, say, 2 and see if your machine is 
swapping at all.

>  Has anyone had such a situation?
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: MailScanner mailing list [mailto:MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf
>Of Kai Schaetzl
>Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 10:32 AM
>To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
>Subject: Re: Performance
>
>
>Pete wrote on         Fri, 2 Apr 2004 19:27:58 +1000:
>
> > Also see the www.mailscanner.info website for info on installing
> > 'clamavmodule' which is supposed to be faster than 'clamav'
> >
>
>but also takes an extra 10 MB for each MailScanner process permanently.
>
>
>Kai
>
>--
>
>Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
>Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
>IE-Center: http://ie5.de & http://msie.winware.org

-- 
Julian Field
www.MailScanner.info
Professional Support Services at www.MailScanner.biz
MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support
PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654