A simple question

[Julian Field]

This has been discussed at length before :-)
  It's not a trivial change and not one I have had the time to fully analyse.

At 10:45 01/04/2004, you wrote:
>Dear julian,
>  looking at the log from mailscanner, and the web pages, the spam check
> is done before the virus check.
>
>But if a mail is a virus, the spam check is unuseful. This sequence could
>be easily inverted ? (Or I'm wrong ?)
>
>Thanks.
>
>Ps. thanks also for the AV suggestions for solx86...
>--
>Dott. Sergio Rabellino
>
>  Technical Staff
>  Department of Computer Science
>  University of Torino (Italy)
>
>http://www.di.unito.it/~rabser
>Tel. +39-0116706701
>Fax. +39-011751603

--
Julian Field
www.MailScanner.info
MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support

PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654