Feature request or can MS..??

Julian Field mailscanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk
Tue Sep 23 16:51:22 IST 2003


At 16:45 23/09/2003, you wrote:
>>I'm thinking even more aggressive than strip html since outlook rebuilds
>>html links in text form.  But in lieu of a new action, would it be easy
>>to make the options for spam available for treatment of cleaned viruses
>>and dangerous HTML?  I could then strip the html and make the message an
>>attachment.  That would at least cause my users to stop and think.  Most
>>of them are trained not to open strange attachments.
>
>Non Spam Actions = /etc/MailScanner/rules/non.spam.actions.rules
>
>which then contains
>
>Virus: Gibe-F   striphtml attachment deliver
>FromOrTo: default       deliver

Actually, I think that bit probably won't work. The Non Spam Actions are
worked out before the virus scanning has happened. I might change that so
it does work in a future version, but need to consider the consequences of
such a change carefully first.
--
Julian Field
www.MailScanner.info
MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support



More information about the MailScanner mailing list