SOLVED Filename Subject Text vs. Content Subject Text

Mariano Absatz mailscanner at LISTS.COM.AR
Thu Sep 11 16:08:33 IST 2003


Great!
thanx.

BTW, you did notice the new Spanish translations I sent in 
http://tinyurl.com/n09l did you?

I was away for half a way after that and only noticed a thread about the 
rightness (or wrongness) of sending archive attachments to the list.

Anyway, the tgz archive seems to have made it even to the list archive, so 
you can take it from there... next time, I'll upload it and post the URL.

Regards.

El 11 Sep 2003 a las 4:13, Julian Field escribió:

> Done. Thanks for that.
> 
> At 14:34 10/09/2003, you wrote:
> >Alright... I look at the code and the bug is quite trivial.
> >
> >The following patch solves it:
> >
> >===================================CUT HERE==================================
> >--- Message.pm.orig     Wed Sep 10 10:27:53 2003
> >+++ Message.pm  Wed Sep 10 10:29:45 2003
> >@@ -1923,7 +1923,7 @@
> >        !$this->{nameinfected} && # They want the tagging & not already tagged
> >        !$global::MS->{mta}->TextStartsHeader($this, 'Subject:', 
> > $contenttag))
> >{
> >      if (MailScanner::Config::Value('contentprependsubject',$this)) {
> >-      $global::MS->{mta}->PrependHeader($this, 'Subject:', $nametag, ' ');
> >+      $global::MS->{mta}->PrependHeader($this, 'Subject:', $contenttag, '
> >');
> >        $subjectchanged = 1;
> >      }
> >    } else {
> >===================================CUT HERE==================================
> >
> >Julian,
> >
> >would you apply it to the next release?
> >
> >
> >
> >El 9 Sep 2003 a las 23:43, Ulysees escribió:
> >
> > > I'm getting the same thing, MS 4.23-11 no SA and any mail being caught with
> > > a html form is coming up with filename?
> > >
> > > uly
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Mariano Absatz" <mailscanner at LISTS.COM.AR>
> > > To: <MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 10:35 PM
> > > Subject: [MAILSCANNER] Filename Subject Text vs. Content Subject Text
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'm using MS 4.23-11 with SA 2.55.
> > >
> > > It seems MS is somehow confusing "Filename Subject Text" "Content Subject
> > > Text".
> > >
> > > I have the following settings:
> > > Allow IFrame Tags = no
> > > Log IFrame Tags = yes
> > > Allow Form Tags = no
> > > Allow Object Codebase Tags = no
> > > Filename Modify Subject = no
> > > Filename Subject Text = {Nombre de archivo anexo prohibido}
> > > Content Modify Subject = yes
> > > Content Subject Text = {Contenido potencialmente peligroso}
> > >
> > > And, when getting a message with IFrame, it added the "Filename Subject
> > > Text" instead of the "Content Subject Text" I expected.
> > >
> > > Here's the log:
> > >
> > > Sep  5 14:43:51 or MX[4995]: New Batch: Scanning 1 messages, 43452 bytes
> > > Sep  5 14:43:51 or MX[4995]: Spam Checks: Starting
> > > Sep  5 14:43:54 or MX[4995]: Virus and Content Scanning: Starting
> > > Sep  5 14:43:54 or MX[4995]: Filename Checks: Allowing msg-4995-156.html
> > > (no rule matched)
> > > Sep  5 14:43:54 or MX[4995]: Filename Checks: Allowing msg-4995-155.txt
> > > Sep  5 14:43:54 or MX[4995]: Filetype Checks: Allowing msg-4995-155.txt
> > > Sep  5 14:43:54 or MX[4995]: Filetype Checks: Allowing msg-4995-156.html
> > > Sep  5 14:43:54 or MX[4995]: HTML IFrame tag found in message 1221617 from
> > > boletininformar at redinformar.com.ar
> > > Sep  5 14:43:54 or MX[4995]: Content Checks: Detected HTML-specific
> > > exploits in 1221617
> > > Sep  5 14:43:54 or MX[4995]: Content Checks: Found 1 problems
> > > Sep  5 14:43:54 or MX[4995]: ZM: message 1221617 renamed into 1156463
> > > Sep  5 14:43:54 or MX[4995]: Silent: Delivered 1 messages containing silent
> > > viruses
> > >
> > >
> > > And the modified was:
> > > {Nombre de archivo anexo prohibido} RI-Boletín Informar Computación: 
> > Año 1 -
> > >  Número 51 - SEPTIEMBRE 5, 2003
> > >
> > >
> > > Are these entries mixed up?

--
Mariano Absatz
El Baby
----------------------------------------------------------
Ever notice how fast Windows runs? Neither did I.




More information about the MailScanner mailing list