Content Checks: Detected HTML-specic exploits in h8AGGVSe016972

Kevin Spicer kevins at BMRB.CO.UK
Thu Sep 11 15:15:09 IST 2003


On Thu, 2003-09-11 at 15:08, mikea wrote:

> as far as I can see, they're only dangerous
>if you're running a mailer that is stupid enough to let them do these
>things -- e.g., Outlook, Outlook Express, and their ilk.

I think that (certainly in a corporate environment like mine) it is best
to block any outgoing mail which is likely to be blocked, filtered or
altered by a large number of receiving servers.  My reasoning to users
always centers around "Many sites block mails of that type, you don't
want your clients getting notified that we tried to send them mail that
may have contained a virus, do you..."  By blocking content that other
mail filters are likely to find objectionable I protect my company from
presenting itself in an unprofessional way through the format of its
email.

Thats my story & I'm sticking to it!




BMRB International
http://www.bmrb.co.uk
+44 (0)20 8566 5000
_________________________________________________________________
This message (and any attachment) is intended only for the
recipient and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material.  If you have received this in error, please contact the
sender and delete this message immediately.  Disclosure, copying
or other action taken in respect of this email or in
reliance on it is prohibited.  BMRB International Limited
accepts no liability in relation to any personal emails, or
content of any email which does not directly relate to our
business.



More information about the MailScanner mailing list