Training the bayesian engine and sa-learn

[Kevin Spicer]

On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 21:55, G. Armour Van Horn wrote:

>Kevin Spicer wrote:

>> You can best improve the accuracy by adding DCC, razor2 and pyzor,
and
>> by letting SA do RBL checks rather than MailScanner.

>I've always had MailScanner handling the RBL, is there really a
>performance
>or accuracy issue here?

Not _really_, I guess its personal choice.  The thrust of what I was
trying to say was that if the poster was getting false positives from SA
letting  SA do the RBL checks will increase the scores for many spams
increasing the differentiation in scores between spam and ham.  I should
have added that there may be a need to tune the thresholds in this case.




BMRB International
http://www.bmrb.co.uk
+44 (0)20 8566 5000
_________________________________________________________________
This message (and any attachment) is intended only for the
recipient and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material.  If you have received this in error, please contact the
sender and delete this message immediately.  Disclosure, copying
or other action taken in respect of this email or in
reliance on it is prohibited.  BMRB International Limited
accepts no liability in relation to any personal emails, or
content of any email which does not directly relate to our
business.