Using MailScanner with Postfix

Chris Trudeau chris at TRUDEAU.ORG
Tue Oct 14 14:36:08 IST 2003


Postfix runs fine for me...strong and I find it easy to
configure/secure...it performs with no problems for me.

One small annoying little bug...is the way that it writes its queue files
the SQL logging functions in MailScanner pickup redundant email addresses in
the to_address field of the logging.

Steve is working on this, but it remains...and causes my SQL queries to be a
little ugly.

CT


----- Original Message -----
From: "Spicer, Kevin" <Kevin.Spicer at BMRB.CO.UK>
To: <MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 9:26 AM
Subject: Re: Using MailScanner with Postfix


Antony Stone wrote:

> I seem to recall that the main problems lie with trying to run
> different MTA queues across different file systems, because the
> author of Postfix decided to use a somewhat strange file
> system-dependent queue file naming mechanism, which means that queue
> files on different fs's on the same machine are not guaranteed to be
> unique....

Its based on inode number I think, so you have to stay on the same
filesystem and only ever link/unlink files (so they don't move inode).  But
I think thats what MailScanner does anyway isn't it?  (I don't know how
changing the files contents gets round that)



BMRB International
http://www.bmrb.co.uk
+44 (0)20 8566 5000
_________________________________________________________________
This message (and any attachment) is intended only for the
recipient and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material.  If you have received this in error, please contact the
sender and delete this message immediately.  Disclosure, copying
or other action taken in respect of this email or in
reliance on it is prohibited.  BMRB International Limited
accepts no liability in relation to any personal emails, or
content of any email which does not directly relate to our
business.



More information about the MailScanner mailing list