Performance question
Andy Humberston
iah at DMU.AC.UK
Wed Oct 8 18:45:43 IST 2003
> >Isolate where the slowdown is - ie disable SA and see what happens..
> >Reduce the number of messages scanned in MailScanner.conf.
> Check your
> >logs too..
>
> I ran some tests, here are the results:
>
> 1,300/10 min virus:on spam:on
> 1,500/10 min virus:off spam:on
> 6,300/10 min virus:on spam:off
>
> I examined the log, during these tests, there were no
> timeouts for SA or the virus engine. Everything is
> completeing, just slowly, despite there being plenty of
> system resources.
>
We seem to be experiencing exactly the same problem, searching
the web for performance related info for SA seems to advise the
best way to run it is through MailScanner. I have just ran some
Tests on a dual pentium 1.4Ghz box with 1Gig RAM and achieved the
following:
2400/6 min virus:off spam:off
2400/7 min virus:on spam:off (sophos)
2400/20 min virus:on spam:on (razor off)
2400/24 min virus:on spam:on (razor on)
This is on a machine with two U/SCSI 15,000rpm disks mirrored
(Hardware RAID).
It's a machine I've borrowed :)
Andy Humberston
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list