Isolating MailScanner 'slowness'...
Leland J. Steinke
steinkel at PA.NET
Wed Oct 8 14:32:11 IST 2003
Peter Bates wrote:
>>steinkel at PA.NET 08/10/03 13:41:53 >>>
>>How big are your Bayes token files? We have had to zero them out
>>occasionally...
>
>
> -rw-r--r-- 1 postfix postfix 76k Oct 8 14:11 bayes_journal
> -rw-r--r-- 1 postfix postfix 2.6k Oct 8 14:11 bayes_msgcount
> -rw-r--r-- 1 postfix root 2.5M Oct 8 14:10 bayes_seen
> -rw-r--r-- 1 postfix postfix 22M Oct 8 14:10 bayes_toks
>
> ... 22Mb, I guess.
>
> By 'zero them out', do you mean 'rebuild'?
No, I mean 'remove', after stopping MailScanner, with a subsequent restart, of
course. If you do not want to lose the accumlated "knowledge" in the files,
just move them out of the way while testing and move them back if there is no
difference in performance.
>
> Shall I just bite the bullet and upgrade to 2.60 and then do the
> --import?
This problem might be fixed by an upgrade to 2.60, which uses Berkeley DB files.
We are still evaluating 2.60 ourselves.
Leland
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list