spamd?

[Mike Kercher]

My understanding is that MS uses ONLY the necessary perl modules from SA,
and thus is more efficient and faster than spawning spamd for each message.

Mike


-----Original Message-----
From: MailScanner mailing list [mailto:MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf
Of David Gibbs
Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 8:37 AM
To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: spamd?


Anyone know if it's possible to have MailScanner use the spamd process
that's provided with SpamAssassin instead of loading it's own copy of SA?

Thanks!

david