Pyzor testing?

Dan Farmer dan.farmer at PHONEDIR.COM
Tue Nov 18 01:26:41 GMT 2003


Michele-

Yeah, in the errors, you can see pyzor is installed into the python2.3
directory structure, and:
# python
Python 2.3.2 (#1, Nov 14 2003, 14:32:17)
[GCC 2.96 20000731 (Red Hat Linux 7.2 2.96-108.1)] on linux2
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
 >>>

I checked the Bugs link on sourceforge, and see two others with the
exact same symptoms as me with no responses that even hint at what the
cause may be.

I ran the unittests.py file hoping I was doing it right (I know nothing
about python, really) and got the following-

# python unittests.py
..................F
======================================================================
FAIL: test_cleaning (__main__.rfc822BodyCleanerTest)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
   File "unittests.py", line 191, in test_cleaning
     self.assertEqual(line, expected.readline())
   File "/usr/local/lib/python2.3/unittest.py", line 302, in
failUnlessEqual
     raise self.failureException, \
AssertionError: '\n' != '<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>\r\n'

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ran 19 tests in 0.015s

FAILED (failures=1)

there is only one page found by google for the string "test_cleaning",
and it is irrelevant to pyzor, so I'm up a certain creek without a
paddle. Any other ideas?

Dan

On Nov 17, 2003, at 6:02 PM, Michele Neylon :: Blacknight Solutions
wrote:

> Dan
>
> Have you got the correct version of Python installed?
> Pyzor needs a more recent version than any available as standard on
> RH7.*
> M
>
> Mr. Michele Neylon
> Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd
> http://www.blacknightsolutions.ie/
> http://www.search.ie/
> Tel. + 353 (0)59 9139897
> Lowest price domains in Ireland
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: MailScanner mailing list [mailto:MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK]On
>> Behalf Of Dan Farmer
>> Sent: 18 November 2003 00:56
>> To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
>> Subject: Re: Pyzor testing?
>>
>>
>> Boy do I feel stupid, I just realized I could probably test the GTUBE
>> Standard Test Email, so I created a second test message to try, and
>> got
>> the following results:
>>
>> # pyzor check < rfc822.gtube
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>    File "/usr/local/bin/pyzor", line 4, in ?
>>      pyzor.client.run()
>>    File "/usr/local/lib/python2.3/site-packages/pyzor/client.py", line
>> 934, in run
>>      ExecCall().run()
>>    File "/usr/local/lib/python2.3/site-packages/pyzor/client.py", line
>> 188, in run
>>      if not apply(dispatch, (self, args)):
>>    File "/usr/local/lib/python2.3/site-packages/pyzor/client.py", line
>> 264, in check
>>      response = runner.run(server, (digest, server))
>>    File "/usr/local/lib/python2.3/site-packages/pyzor/client.py", line
>> 725, in run
>>      response = apply(self.routine, varargs, kwargs)
>>    File "/usr/local/lib/python2.3/site-packages/pyzor/client.py", line
>> 57, in check
>>      msg = CheckRequest(digest)
>>    File "/usr/local/lib/python2.3/site-packages/pyzor/__init__.py",
>> line
>> 381, in __init__
>>      typecheck(digest, str)
>>    File "/usr/local/lib/python2.3/site-packages/pyzor/__init__.py",
>> line
>> 494, in typecheck
>>      raise TypeError
>> TypeError
>>
>> So apparently, it isn't installed quite right. Does anyone else have
>> this working on RHAS 2.1 (or RH 7.2)?
>>
>> Thanks, again....
>> Dan
>>
>> On Nov 17, 2003, at 5:42 PM, Dan Farmer wrote:
>>
>>> Am I correct in trying to test a message like this:
>>> ] pyzor check < rfc822.spam
>>> 66.250.40.33:24441      (200, 'OK')     48      0
>>
>>
>
> #########################################################
> This message (and any attachment) is intended only for the
> recipient and may contain confidential and/or privileged
> material.  If you have received this in error, please contact the
> sender and delete this message immediately.  Disclosure, copying
> or other action taken in respect of this email or in
> reliance to it is prohibited.
>



More information about the MailScanner mailing list